Friday, May 31, 2019

Human Imperfection Illustrated in Frosts Poem, After Apple Picking Ess

The poem After Apple Picking by Robert Frost expresses the feelings of the narrator during and after the exhibit of harvesting apples by showing the sustainability and ambition of human spirit. Frosts poem is an accurate reflection of life and of human imperfection through the usage of repetition, literal and figurative language and various symbols.The repeated use of the word log Zs resonates throughout the poem and suggests that the narrator is experiencing fatigue and weariness, I am nap off / I cannot rub the strangeness from my sight / Upon my way to sleep before it fell / My instep arch not only keeps the ache / Woodchucks sleep (Frost 8-21) One interpretation of sleep is a final sleep due to sleeps association with winter in this piece. Because winter is most usually associated to death of life, one may assume that was the authors intended definition. However, a more logical and literal interpretation is the fact that the speaker is worn out and tired from picking apples , which would relate to and explain some of the other figures of speech in the poem.T...

Thursday, May 30, 2019

An Understanding of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare :: Papers

An Understanding of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare The dictionarys definition of fate is the development of events outside of a persons say-so predetermined by a supernatural power. What is a Supernatural Power? Again the dictionary says attributed to some force beyond scientific reason or the laws of nature. In another(prenominal) words fate means that it has already been decided, it is inevitable. You can not do any thing to stop it. So in other words your decisions have already been made up and you dont realise. It as considered fate that they would meet and fall hopelessly in love with angiotensin-converting enzyme another and then triadic ally die for each other. Fate brought the two together as well as ended their lives. It was in their stars or as some people would say it was fate. The human condition follows the course of state. Every one makes their choices out by themselves out of in that respect own free will. Which affects there lives and a person around them lives, but will ultimately lead to there pre-determined fate. People inflict their own wounds during struggles and fight because of the choices that they make. This applies a lot in Romeo and Juliet and plays a major role in their lives. For example A pair of star crossed lovers From the Prologue line 6. When they both met for the first time and talked with passion virtually Romeo being a pilgrim and Juliet being a saint, they were already in love with one another. Romeo If I profane with my unworthiness hand this holy shrine, a lenient sin is this, my lips, to blushing pilgrims, ready stand to smooth that rough touch with a tender kiss. Juliet Good pilgrim, you do wrong your hand too much, with well-bred devotion shows in this, for saints have hands that pilgrims hands do touch, and palm to palm is holy palmers kiss The way they talk about each other as if they were soul mates is amazing. They call each other pilgr ims and saints it makes them sound

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Freedom for Rousseau and Individual Liberties Essay -- Jean Jacques Ro

Freedom for Rousseau and Individual LibertiesThe map which Rousseau ostensibly gives his social contract is to free domain from the illegitimate chains to which existing governments confuse confine him. If this is his aim, then it follows that he should be most implicated with the preservation of freedom in political ships company, signly so that savage populace might be lured out of nature and into society in the offshoot place, and afterwards so that Rousseaus framework for this society will prevent the present tyranny from reasserting itself. Indeed, in his definition of purpose for mans initial union into society, he claims that, despite his membership in an association to which he must necessarily have some sort of obligation if the contract is to be valid, he will obey only himself and remain as free as before (I.vi. 4). However, only a paragraph later, he appears to contradict this intellection entirely, saying instead that mens union into society constitutes the to tal alienation of each bear on with all of his rights to the whole community (I.vi.6). This apparent contradiction begs the question, what is the freedom that Rousseau envisions for man, and how does this kind of freedom relate to individual rights and protect the individual within a society governed by the general will? Rousseaus founding of freedom begins to take shape in the transition from nature to society, in which a fundamental miscue occurs in human nature that translates into a replace in the nature of freedom between the two states. Entrance into civil society, Rousseau argues, produces the most remarkable budge in man by substituting legal expert for instinct in his conduct (I.viii.1). That is, entering civil society allows man to exist peacefully in ... ...s him without any recourse except to unsay the unvaried error of his ways and obey. Rousseau opens The Social Contract with the claim that he is taking men as they are, moreover he is in fact taking man as h e wishes he might someday become, as his theory of human perfectionism betrays (I.i.1). And while Hobbes understands that man will never bow voluntarily to compulsion and will fight for his life inside and outside of society, Rousseau thinks man can be conditioned to accept coercion as a blessing so that no force will need to be exerted to keep him in order. And in the process of do men in the image of his minds eye, he is willing himself to tolerate what he calls the most enormous abuses, from the subjection of mens truly thoughts to the jurisdiction of the law, down to the right of the sovereign to course citizens it deems a danger to its amorphous good. Freedom for Rousseau and Individual Liberties Essay -- Jean Jacques RoFreedom for Rousseau and Individual LibertiesThe purpose which Rousseau ostensibly gives his social contract is to free man from the illegitimate chains to which existing governments have shackled him. If this is his aim, then it follows tha t he should be most concerned with the preservation of freedom in political society, initially so that savage man might be lured out of nature and into society in the first place, and afterwards so that Rousseaus framework for this society will prevent the present tyranny from reasserting itself. Indeed, in his definition of purpose for mans initial union into society, he claims that, despite his membership in an association to which he must necessarily have some sort of obligation if the contract is to be valid, he will obey only himself and remain as free as before (I.vi. 4). However, hardly a paragraph later, he appears to contradict this idea entirely, saying instead that mens union into society constitutes the total alienation of each associate with all of his rights to the whole community (I.vi.6). This apparent contradiction begs the question, what is the freedom that Rousseau envisions for man, and how does this kind of freedom relate to individual rights and protect the ind ividual within a society governed by the general will? Rousseaus conception of freedom begins to take shape in the transition from nature to society, in which a fundamental shift occurs in human nature that translates into a change in the nature of freedom between the two states. Entrance into civil society, Rousseau argues, produces the most remarkable change in man by substituting justice for instinct in his conduct (I.viii.1). That is, entering civil society allows man to exist peacefully in ... ...s him without any recourse except to accept the constant error of his ways and obey. Rousseau opens The Social Contract with the claim that he is taking men as they are, but he is in fact taking man as he wishes he might someday become, as his theory of human perfectionism betrays (I.i.1). And while Hobbes understands that man will never bow voluntarily to coercion and will fight for his life inside and outside of society, Rousseau thinks man can be conditioned to accept coercion as a blessing so that no force will need to be exerted to keep him in order. And in the process of shaping men in the image of his minds eye, he is willing himself to tolerate what he calls the most enormous abuses, from the subjection of mens very thoughts to the jurisdiction of the law, down to the right of the sovereign to execute citizens it deems a danger to its amorphous good.

A few words on Dantes Inferno Essay -- essays research papers

A Few Words on Dantes InfernoLike in the Inferno, where the gates of Hell begin the journey to the bottom, so carriage is began by birth, and the journey to Eternity begins. Some lives be more easily lead than others, like some of the punishments in Dantes version of Hell are worse than others. Although in Hell, there is no hope, non even the hope of hope, the journey that Dante and Virgil take pile be contrastd with the journey of life. Just the fact that Dante has someone to guide him can be comparison, everyone in life has a Guardian Angel assigned to them, as Dante had his own guide in his journey. But to compare all parts of life to the Inferno, one must start at the beginning to realized the end. The birth of body, and the death of the soul.Midway on his journey through with(predicate) life, Dante realizes he has taken the wrong path. He is lucky. Many of those on the wrong path in their own lives have started on that same path on which they will also end Dante realize s his error and, in attempting to set himself back on the right path, he goes on an important journey. Like those who also betray from their right path, this poet must embark on a fantastic and terrifying journey of exploration and self discovery.In the Inferno, the circle of Hell is determined by the sins the person (soul) committed while still alive on earth. For their deeds, they suffer eternally according to Divine Justice. The people one sees in life can already have chosen their eternal fate. Their outward actions may determine which part of Hell they are sent to, if indeed they are fated to go there and if Hell is the way Dante puts it.In the first Canto, Dante realizes he is lost. He says that he does not remember how he lost his way, but he has wandered into a fearful place, a dark and tangled valley. Above, he sees a great hill that seems to offer protection from the shadowed vale. The sun shines down from this hilltop, and Dante attempts to climb toward the light. As he climbs, however, he encounters three angry beasts a leopard, a lion, and a she-wolfwhich force him to turn back. Returning in despair to the dark valley, Dante sees a humanity form in the woods, which soon reveals itself to be the soul of the great Roman poet Virgil.&nbs... ... in the trials that lurk ahead, and the reward lost unless it is remembered. But the journey alone is not enough. Choices must be made upon this journey, and blinded by distractions, wrong choices are often made. Many are afraid of where their trip will take them, whether or not they will make the right choices, and like those in the ante Inferno, they make the choice not to make a choice and receive a punishment appropriate to their crime, and are forever tormented by their own indecision. But there are far worse punishments.As Dante and Virgil go through Hell, Dante observes the different punishments of the souls for the corresponding crimes that they committed while still on earth. This raises a question was Dante biased in his placement of the souls in Hell? Did his own ain experiences with people he placed in Hell affect the way they were punished in his story? Would someone else put it differently? To answer this question, yes. ground on the personal opinions of many asked, Dante did put people he disliked in certain lower circles of Hell than he did of other well cognise people. But this raises more questions.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Marx And Mills Essay -- Marx Mills Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Marx And Mills John Stuart Mill suggests that a soulfulnesss ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of blessedness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by delectation, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mills position on happiness, and the cerebrate behind it. Showing where there ar agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will utter what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the pull outlines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the greatest happiness principle. This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill march on explores the need for pleasure by noting a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy. . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mills criteria for happiness is easily understood, some controversys that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is straightway related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if mor tals goal in life was to be poor and starving. This being said, it does not mean that people are only happy due riches but that no ones goals are focused on poverty. Although there are many issues that can be agreeable with Mill, there are problems that exist with his theory of utilitarianism. First, Mill says that all ethical decisions should be based on pleasure. This statement becomes questionable when Mill... ...o are polar opposites. This statement holds true no matter what one believes. To find happiness, the opposing sides must find a suitable balance. This does not mean that pain is always a daily art object of life, but that it can not and should not be avoided. If one were to try to avoid pain, it is quite possible that they would inadvertently pass up pleasure. This would happen because a person would be too worried to take a chance on failing. Pain is a part of life just as pleasure is. To reap the benefits of one, there must be consequences given to the other. There is a quote that goes, You must drink from the chalice of pain, before you can sip from the elixir of self-respect Another criteria for happiness and morality should be based upon attentions. If one performs a moral action, but has immoral intentions, that person should not be considered ethically correct. To be truly right and happy, one must not only act but think right. Mill suggests that pleasure should guide our decision-making. While the statement is true, it is not fully correct. If a person will deal with pain that come from hard work, dedication, and perseverance, then the benefits will be that much sweeter.

Marx And Mills Essay -- Marx Mills Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Marx And Mills tin can Stuart Mill suggests that a individuals ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of merriment that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which cheer can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, just by pain as well. This paper will examine Mills position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there atomic number 18 agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that unrivaled should guide his or her judgements by what will give in pleasure. Mill believes that a person should al ways seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the greatest happiness principle. This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy. . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more whollyuring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mills criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be ab surd if someones goal in carriage was to be poor and starving. This being said, it does not mean that people are only happy due wealth but that no ones goals are focused on poverty. Although there are many issues that can be agreeable with Mill, there are problems that exist with his theory of utilitarianism. First, Mill says that all ethical decisions should be based on pleasure. This statement becomes questionable when Mill... ...o are polar opposites. This statement holds true no matter what one believes. To find happiness, the fence sides must find a suitable balance. This does not mean that pain is always a daily part of life, but that it can not and should not be avoided. If one were to try to avoid pain, it is quite possible that they would inadvertently pass up pleasure. This would happen because a person would be too upset(a) to take a chance on failing. Pain is a part of life just as pleasure is. To reap the benefits of one, there must be consequences given to the othe r. There is a quote that goes, You must drink from the chalice of pain, before you can sip from the elixir of self-respect Another criteria for happiness and theology should be based upon attentions. If one performs a moral action, but has immoral intentions, that person should not be considered ethically correct. To be truly right and happy, one must not only act but think right. Mill suggests that pleasure should guide our decision-making. While the statement is true, it is not fully correct. If a person will deal with pain that come from hard work, dedication, and perseverance, then the benefits will be that much sweeter.

Monday, May 27, 2019

Rethinking Project Management Essay

The general models show demeanour arising from the complex interactions of the various parts of the project they demonstrate how behaviour arises that would not be predicted from an abbreviation of the separate parts of the project and thus show how the tralatitious decomposition models in near circumstances can be inadequate. The project behaviour shown in this body of work is complex and non-intuitive. It shows causal feed-back, leading to nonlinear behaviour, and produces e? ects which can sometimes manifest themselves after signi? cant time-delays and the behaviour of such systems is di? delirium for the human brain to predict and understand intuitively. Furthermore, the models di? er from the bodies of knowledge in their empha- is on soft factors the factors within the feedback loops are not only hard cover factors soft variables are a good deal important links in the chains of causality and are thus critical in determining the project behaviour such variables might inc lude morale, schedule pressure, client changing his mind and so on in addition, there is a recognition that the models need to stop not only real data but perplexity perceptions of data. Systemic models have been used to explain failures occurring in projects which might have been well-managed by traditional project- focus methods. The failures analysed by these methods are in complex projects subject to uncertainty.Conventional techniques are designed for projects with large numbers of elements, but the assumed structures are subject to genuinely limited types of interdependence, and effected methods are even more unsuited to projects under high uncertainty. It is when uncertainty a? ects a traditionally-managed project that is structurally complex that the systemic e? ects discussed above start to occur. But the systemic models demonstrated an important aspect it is circumspection actions to accelerate perturbed projects which particularly exacerbate the feedback when the pro ject is heavily time-constrained, so the project manager feels forced to take acceleration actions, and this produces the problems from feedback.Thus we have identi? ed the three compounding factors which come together in complex structures of corroboratory feedback to cause extreme over-runs when projects are managed conventionally structural complexity, uncertainty and a tight time-constraint. Recognition of the problems inherent in conventional prescriptive procedures has led to the instruction of contrasting project charge methodologies. While being within a strategic framework, these methodologies are usually identi? ed by words such as lean or agile, and are particularly prevalent in the software industry 55 (perhaps due to the particular goal-uncertainties of such projects).These methods contradict the underlying emphases of conventional approaches the project emerges rather than being entirely pre-planned the management style is much more co-operative, recognising that the Plan prepared pre-project is fallible and incomplete, and there is acceptance that the plan cannot be fully prepared because of the in? uence of the external environment. The systemic modelling work analysed the reasons for project over-runs for many seriously over-run project, giving explanations in terms of positive feedback, often exacerbated by management actions, and importantly including both hard and soft factors in the causal analysis the analysis shows that conventional methods can be inappropriate and potentially disadvantageous for projects that are structurally complex, uncertain, and heavily time-limited. objectifys which exhibit these three characteristics would appear to lend themselves less to conventional methods and newer methods might be more appropriate, such as agile/lean methods often called agile or lean. However, the thesis of Williams 54 is not that we should simply ignore conventional project 684 S. Cicmil et al. / International Journal of Project Manageme nt 24 (2006) 675686 management methods and move to these opposing techniques. Rather, with the understanding gained from this analysis of the systemic modelling work, we need to move our discourse to take account of the e? ects encompassed in this work then we need to categorise projects according to the dimensions which give projects a propensity for the type of systemic e? ects, so that an appropriate management style can be speci? d, in particular an appropriate balance between conventional methods as espoused in the bodies of knowledge and these contrasting methods. This work suggests that at one time a project is subject to disruptions and delays dynamics then the traditional project management tools are probably inappropriate for managing the project. The use of traditional tools is likely to accidentally exacerbate the undesirable consequences and lead to greater overruns than need be the case. Even the nature of the agenda at project progress meetings needs to have a di? e rent focus and emphasis. Awareness of the potential consequences of mitigation becomes important as possible traditionally obvious actions are proposed. 7.Conclusions, implications and the way forward Our aim in this melodic theme has been to discuss critically the nature of knowledge that could be created about the actuality of projects and how it contributes to our understanding of project environments, to improvements in practice, and to educational and developmental e? orts. We attempted to shed some light on the assumptions behind theoretical and methodological approaches to interrogationing the actuality of projects and project management that, in our view, can be helpful in broadening the boundaries of the project management body of thought and contributing to more satisfactory processes and outcomes of contemporary projects.Researching the actuality of projects, as presented in this article, draws on a combination of practical philosophical considerations and concrete se miempirical analyses towards understanding human action, and for that matter, managerial action in the concrete situation and requires a theoretical shift from more common normative rational approaches to individual and project performance towards a more developmental one which focuses on practical action, lived experience, quality of fond interaction and communicative relating, operations of power in context, identity, and the relationship between agency and structure in project environments.The research presented in this paper as exemplars of actuality research provide some compelling and elicit insights into the actuality of managing projects addressing on-going gaps in our knowledge of how to e? ectively manage complex undertakings. Cicmil and Marshall develop an empirically grounded understanding of project complexity that incorporates processes of communicative and power relating among project actors dealings with ambiguity and equivocality related to project performance c riteria (success/failure) over time that is in constant ? ux. Cicmil and Hodgsons work casts light on the traditional foundations of project management practitioner development and demonstrates the need for developing both instrumental and value rationality as the basis for project management practice.The research by doubting Thomas and Buckle questions the underlying assumptions embedded in traditional project management discourse and explores the impact of these embedded assumptions on the practice and practical discourse of practitioners. The Strathclyde research teams work on understanding complex project failures contributes signi? cantly to our understanding of the complex interactions between the actuality of projects and the unintentional consequences of applying traditional best practice say-so oriented project management to complete projects under extreme time pressures. All of these research studies make signi? cant contributions to an understanding of the actuality of p rojects and provide insights into how project management practitioner development needs to change to address these project realities.Methodological issues (epistemology, ontology, and representation) are also of dominant concern in these studies. The argument is that theory and empirical research must proceed simultaneously on micro and macro levels of analysis and within both objective and subjective methodological traditions, focusing on action which is habituated, practical, tacit, dispositional, and at the same time structured. From this perspective, it is important not only to explore or explain what is but also to examine why it is as it is and what activities are encouraged or discouraged by this focus, and how it comes to be. The recommended methodological approaches are capable of addressing a much wider range of mportant project issues such as the social responsibility of management, ethical conduct, bounded rationality, anxiety, emotions, the operation of dominant discour ses, power/knowledge relationship, culture, and identity. Despite this, we do not promote actuality research as a competing or privileged stream of thought to the more mainstream ones. We argue for it as an alternative lens through which new insights into projects and project management practice can be generated. One of the key assertions is that the understanding which drives much of project management literature does not satisfactorily explain the richness of what actually occurs in project environments.http//www.uwe.ac.uk/ bulletin board system/trr/Is7-cont.htm

Sunday, May 26, 2019

Lincoln: An American Historical Drama Film by Steven Spielberg Essay

Lincoln is a 2012 American historical drama film directed and produced by Steven Spielberg, feature Daniel Day-Lewis as unite States President Abraham Lincoln and S eithery Field as Mary Todd Lincoln. The film is based in cleave on Doris Kearns Goodwins memorial of Lincoln, Team of Rivals The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, and covers the final four months of Lincolns life, focusing on the Presidents efforts in January 1865 to have the Thirteenth Am endment to the United States Constitution passed by the United States House of Representatives.Lincoln begins a year before the end of the civil war with the movies only employment scene. Its a minute of the bloody, hand-to-hand combat at Jenkins Ferry, Arkansas. Then two black soldiers recall the battle while talking to Lincoln well-nigh the future of the Union. In January 1865, and United States President Abraham Lincoln had just started his second term in office as an extremely popular leader, especially among his supporters. However, the dry land is in disorder with the Civil War entering its fourth year and having taken the lives of many a soldier on both sides.Lincoln believes that head of the Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution This would declare that neither thraldom nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall come through within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction, would most importantly achieve something he strongly believed in, but also end the war since slavery was a large rea countersign for it.The Amendment already passed in the Senate, and was scheduled for vote in the House of Representatives at the end of the month. While he is assured of yes votes from his fellow Republicans, he and his team had to work hard under the radar to assure enough yes votes from Democrats, which will require compromise in new(prenominal) areas. But other factors may also come into play on the vote, such as the Confederate forces in the war issuing their own compromise to end the war but keep slavery.Meanwhile, Lincoln also deals with hostile relationship with wife Mary Todd Lincoln and their latest situation in oldest son Robert leaving law school to enlist. From personal experience, President Lincoln is thought of as one of the most influential and best president throughout history. Abolishing slavery rightfully put the nation on its path to unity and the superpower it is today. Even though throughout history after that historical event at that place has been several steps taken to further his actions to make black and whites and equal part f society, abolishing slavery was the largest and most influential step. After ceremonial this film, it became unequivocal that President Lincoln was an extremely well respected man and made the hard decisions that he knew wouldnt be popular at the time because of how the state was structured. The film illustrated that Lincoln was wise beyon d his years and knew that his decisions would impact the nation in a positive manner for the rest of time. President Lincolns leadership skills were evident and were the major theme in the film.From the beginning of the movie, from his wife to his cabinet members, everyone was trying to convince him that getting rid of slavery wasnt overtaking to happen and he will lose the approval of his country by pushing the issue. Slavery in the United States was a way of life up to that point. Blacks were not considered equal and were looked at more as property than people. From the first President until Lincolns time everyone including the past presidents had slaves. Slaves were a major part of the economy because of the labor power that was being utilized.Slaves were used as servants, worked in the fields for countless hours and used for everyday jobs that today are vital occupations. With the thirteenth Amendment, slaves would be freed of their unpaid work and would now have to be compensa ted for their time and would cause many people to lose money. Of course such an Brobdingnagian decision to change the entire culture of the country would be hated by a majority of the people. President Lincoln felt strongly around the issue and was looking at the big picture of the country, not the present, which is why he is considered one of the best presidents of all time.Being a leader content not always making the popular decision. Its making the hard decisions that are not always the popular one, but the one that will this instant or indirectly benefit, in President Lincolns case, the country as a whole. Even in todays society in that respect is still racism and controversy between ethnicities. Until the 1950s, not too long ago, there was still segregation and blacks were not looked at as equals. After watching this movie, these themes really stood out and hit home about how far the country has come since President Lincoln made one of the most historical decisions of all time.His leadership skills are evident throughout the course of the movie by being able to sway the decisions of both parties into standing by his decision and accept in him that the 13th Amendment was the right thing. I would absolutely recommend this movie to everyone, young or old, because of the history thats behind it. The scene of the movie that really stood out was in the end of the film when the votes were being cast and the leader of the house asked to cast his vote.He was called out by a Democrat that was against the amendment because it was an unpredictable occurrence for him to cast a vote but responded with, This is a historical event. President Lincoln changed history and this country forever. Even though it took over a century to get to where we are as a country today and many major events occurring in between, President Lincoln was arguably in my belief the indirect forefather of the civil rights movement and one of the most influential men in history.

Saturday, May 25, 2019

Greatest Ambition Summary Essay

Morris Lurie was born in Melbourne in 1938. He is better known for his short stories though he has written some novels too. He has won several awards in Australia for fiction. The years spent away from Australia in voluntary exile form the subject matter of much of his writing. Background/SettingThe main character is a school boy whose greatest ambition is to be a comic strip mechanic. The story explores the uncertainties and trials of being an adolescent with unsupportive parents.In the short story My Greatest Ambition by Morris Lurie, we experience the dis errorment of a thirteen-year-old boy as he tries to live a dream that he initially thought would set him apart from all others. Nus illusion is set up when his father calls him a prince right before Nus meeting. It was the starting signal time that his father had complimented him throughout the duration of the memoir. Even though his father was not directly trying to give Nu false hope, the effect of this praise on Nu seemed t o point him to that direction. The reference to a prince relates to success and fortune, which would subconsciously give Nu the impression that he would prosper and become a successful comic strip artist at Boy magazine.The disillusionment begins when he approaches the office. Nu expects the create itself to be grand and imposing but instead he sees a very mediocre building that looked like a factory. He outlines his disappointment when he says No neon, no massive areas of plate glass, no exotic plants growing in face cloth gravel. Each time he repeated the word no, it added to his growing sense of disappointment. He also uses repetition with the word ordinary as he describes the details of the building, which emphasises his realisation of disillusionment.When Nu is being toured around the factory he says, I was eating an ice-cream, which indirectly makes Nu seem more immature and out of place. This contrasts from the illusion that Nu had earlier of himself walking to work every m orningwith a pipe in my (his) mouth. Since his fantasy of being a grown man smoking his pipe and going to work had turned into being a 13 year old in a ridiculous suit eating ice-cream, the disillusionment becomes a more prominent factor in the story.

Friday, May 24, 2019

Types of Literary Criticism

Types of Literary Criticism Since ancient times, find outers have debated and critiqued literature from a variety of perspectives. Some have looked at a story or play from a moral stance, considering how values are represented in a text. Another critic efficiency evaluate a poem in terms of its form. Recent critics have looked at literature to see what it might be saying about our lives in society, our policy-making or power relations, gender roles, or sexuality. Below I have summarized some types of literary lit crit you might consider when reading or authorship about literature.If youre interested in knowing more, see the Purdue Online Writing Lab or OWL or read Critical Theory Today A User-Friendly Guide, by Louis Tyson. The Gavilan library website offers resources for students conducting research on literature. (You will need a Gavilan library card to access this information and can apply for a card in person or online. ) The library also has a helpful website on Academic look for Guidelines that will help you identify legitmate sources for your research and avoid plagiarism.See me, a librarian, and/or a writing assistant at the Gavilan Writing Center for help with writing about literature. * Moral Criticism, Dramatic Construction (360 BC-present) * Formalism, modern Criticism, Neo-Aristotelian Criticism (1930s-present) * Psychoanalytic Criticism, Jungian Criticism(1930s-present) * Marxist Criticism (1930s-present) * Reader-Response Criticism (1960s-present) * Structuralism/Semiotics (1920s-present) * Post-Structuralism/Deconstruction (1966-present) * New Historicism/Cultural Studies (1980s-present) * Post-Colonial Criticism (1990s-present) Feminist Criticism (1960s-present) * Gender/Queer Studies (1970s-present) Sociological reprehension Like historical criticism, sociological criticism examines literature in the cultural, economic, and policy-making context in which it is written or received. This type of criticism may analyze the social conten t of a literary workthe cultural, economic, or political values a particular text implicitly or explicitly expresses. Reader-response criticism This type of criticism attempts to describe what happens in the readers judge workforcet while interpreting a text.A reader-response critic might also explore the impact of a particular text on his or her own ideas or values. For example, unitary might reflect on how a particular character seems admirable or unlikable and why. One might reflect on how ones religious, culture, or social values affect readings. It also overlaps with gender criticism in exploring how men and women may read the same text with contrastive assumptions. Gender criticism This type of criticism examines how sexual identity influences the creation and reception of literary works.Gender studies originated during the feminist movement, when critics began investigating the unexamined assumptions around gender in a piece of literature. Feminist critics explored how an authors gender mightconsciously or unconsciouslyaffect his or her writing. These critics may also explore how images of men or women in literature might reflect or reject the social norms around gender in a particular society. Mythological criticism Mythological critics explore the universal patterns underlying a literary work.This type of criticism draws on the insights of anthropology, history, psychology, and comparative religion to explore how a text uses myths and symbols drawn from different cultures and epochs. A central concept in mythological criticism is the archetype, a symbol, character, situation, or image that evokes a deep universal response. For example, critic Joseph Campbell, in his books like The Hero with a Thousand Faces, demonstrates how similar mythic characters and situations, like the heros journey, appear in virtually every culture. biographical criticism Biographical critics explore how understanding an authors life can help readers more thoroughly compre hend the literary work. Note biographical critics are not concerned with simply describing the authors life but instead with interpreting the literary work using the insights provided by knowledge of the authors life. New Historicism New historicist critics look at the impact of the politics, ideologies, and social customs of the authors world on the themes, images, and characterizations of a text.This type of critic considers the historical events or conditions during which the work was written. Psychoanalytic criticism This type of criticism views the themes, conflicts, and characterizations of a work primarily as a reflection of the needs, emotions, states of mind, or subconscious desires of the author. Formalist criticism Formalist critics look closely at the work itself, analyzing the various elements of the work as a way of explicating or interpreting a text.

Thursday, May 23, 2019

Differentiating Between Market Structures Essay

Coca-Cola is one of the worlds top selling soft suck up companies. Coca-Cola has continuously progressed since it began 1886. A pharmacist in Atlanta named Dr. John S. Pemberton created a unique soft drink flavor that could be sold at soda fountains. The credit for the name and plow define goes to Frank M. Robinson. Frank was Dr. Pembertons partner and bookkeeper. Today Coca-Cola is the manufacturer of over 500 brands of increases sold in over 200 countries worldwide. The Coca-Cola Company operates in an oligopoly. An oligopoly is a mart structure in which there atomic number 18 only a few potents and unfalterings explicitly take from other firms handlely response into account there are often significant barriers to entry that prevent smaller firms from making an impact(Colander, 2013).There are several different reasons why Coca-Cola is an oligopoly. Only two firms master the majority of the trade share, Coca-Cola and Pepsi. There are other smaller firms in the securit ies industry, but their market share in the industry is very small when compared to these two major firms. Small companies do not have the financial capital to start a brand on a massive scale. For, small companies, the barriers to entry the industry are too high. The high operating cost of production in the soft drink industry prevents companies from entering the soft drink market.ComparisonsOligopoly has antecedently been defined as a market structure in which there are only a few firms and firms explicitly take from other firms likely response into account there are often significant barriers to entry that prevent smaller firms from making an impact(Colander, 2013). A few firms mean the number of firms has to be significantly low, as in this case two Coca- Cola and Pepsi, for there to be acknowledgment that each firm aware that its future prospects depend on both its policies and the policies of its rival. Firms in oligopoly can use either high-price strategy or low-price strate gy to maximize their profit. An industry is defined as a group of firms where the firms products are close substitutes for one another that have a high and positive cross elasticity of demand (WEI, 2012). Coca-Cola and Pepsi are in an oligopoly market. both(prenominal) companies sell the same product, giving them power over pricing, both companies will take into consideration each others actions are changing the prices of theirproducts. Prices of their goods usually change according to the kinked demand curve.The kinked demand curve theory is an economic theory roughly oligopoly and monopolistic competition. If other firms ignored price increases and price decreases brought about lowering of prices by competitors, the firm will have a demand curve with the kink at the present market price of P*. Firms guess that a kinked demand curve is brought about from basic strategic considerations. Usually, low pricing strategy is use by both firms simultaneously to increase market profits. As the summer holidays approach, the firms will use harsh competition practices to buildup sales, and in turn increase profit. Game theory is applied to be a market share. A game theory is a pricing policy, and it helps a firm to enhance profit (WEI, 2012). The barriers are high to enter this market.Coca-Cola and Pepsi have signed a cartel contract. The two firms will become a cartel to avoid other firm from entering this market because it will decrease their economic profit. trustingness is a small number of firms acting together to limit cost, raise price, and increase profit. Neither Coca-Cola nor Pepsi exit from this market, another firm will become a monopoly. The soft drink price will become higher (WEI, 2012). Monopolistic competition is present when the market has multiple sellers marketing differentiated products. Retail trade can be used as an example. Oligopoly represents a steady market form where a few sellers dominate in the market and each firm has a certain amount of share of the market. Both firms are aware of their dependence on each other.Competitive StrategiesCoca-Cola and Pepsi take part in non-price product differentiation. Product differentiation is the process of distinguishing a service or product from other products, to make it more appealing to a targeted market. On a exalted occasion, will you see Pepsi try to challenge Coca-Cola in pricing. These two companies use creative advertisement instead. Another competitive strategy that, can be used by Coca-Cola is to produce their product globally. Coca-Cola will need to obtain contracts with restaurant chains to be their sole distributor of soft drinks.By partnering with major regimen chains, it guarantees that consumers on have the choice of purchasing their product. If you only have one choice, it is almost a guarantee your product will be purchased. Product packaging, which is likewise another form of productdifferentiation. Coca-Cola cans and bottles are constantly changing to g ive consumers a new sense of worth. If Coca-Cola did not keep its packaging updated, Pepsi would gain market share from consumers who have become bored Coca-Cola customers.RecommendationsLoyalty programs can be used to gain customer loyalty. Coca-Cola can offer discounts and free products to customers who buy giving quantities of their product. Loyalty programs would provide an encouragement for customers to stay loyal to the Coca-Cola brand. Product line expansion, by expanding their product line Coca-Cola will be able to reach a wide variety of customers. With the growth of the global economy, Coca-Cola will need to target the tastes of certain customers. An example would be peoples soft drink choices are different in Asia than they are in Africa. There will have to do an enormous amount of research and testing to find the right products for these markets. Although the coronation will be costly, it will prove to be valuable in the long run.SummaryCoca-Cola is in an oligopoly mar ket for obvious reasons. Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominate the soft drink market. There are significant barriers to entry that prevent smaller firms from making an impact on the market. Because of their dominance, the two companies can compete in area like marketing and product expansion to maximize profit. Success is driven by product differentiation through product packaging and advertising. By putting into touch loyalty programs and expanding the product line, Coca-Cola will continue to be the top selling soft drink company.ReferenceLin, H. (2012). Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi The Economics behind Cokes Dominance. Retrieved from http//economicstudents.com/2012/10/coca-cola-vs-pepsi-the-economics-behind-cokes-dominance/ Wei, G. C. (2012). Oligopoly-Coca-Cola & Pepsi. Retrieved from http//economicsdicussion.blogspot.com/2012/11/oligopoly-coca-cola-pepsi.html Octotutor. (2014). The Market Structure of the Coca-Cola Company. Retrieved from http//octotutor.com/the-market-structure-of-the-coca-cola- company/